Sunday, February 8, 2009

SLR or Point & Shoot.....

No this is not just another post telling you to either buy a SLR or extolling you buy X over Y.If you're already out there to but a camera , you've probably already discovered that the showroom has a seemingly endless array of options out there. Even if you narrow your choices to models from vendors that you've heard of, you'll still have scores of options to choose from.
One reason there are so many digital cameras is that digital photography is a huge market, and there are a lot of companies that want to cash in on it. But there's also a practical reason for vendors to release so many different cameras: By segmenting the market into thin little slices, they can produce cameras tailored to a very specific set of needs. While this might force you to look at more camera candidates, it means you can probably find a model that's just right for you. And if you define your needs early on, you can immediately weed out a bunch of irrelevant models.
We begin a detailed discussion of all of the issues and considerations you need to make when hunting for a digital camera. With just a little diligence, you should have no trouble finding a camera that yields very good images, delivers the features you want, and is reasonably affordable.


Not Your Cousins Musuem Trip: There's only one critical difference between a digital camera and a film camera: A digital camera has a silicon image sensor sitting on its focal plane instead of a piece of film.
Sure, digital cameras can be weird shapes, and they have LCD screens, and so on and so forth, but it's that image sensor that makes digital a dramatically different technology than analog photography. Because the physics of light stay the same whether you're shooting digital or film, the science of digital photography is largely identical to the science of analog photography.
When you buy a film camera, you don't have to worry about the quality of the images it will produce because you select your imaging technology later, when you choose a film. So when you buy a film camera, you look for features, feel, and lens availability, and only later consider the imaging properties of a particular film. With digital, you've got to consider all of these at the same time.
With that said, it's also important to know that you shouldn't go overboard when assessing image quality. These days, most cameras from reputable vendors produce very good images. The technology in mid-range cameras has trickled down from high-quality, high-end cameras, and it's difficult to buy an outright bad camera from an established camera maker.
Before you begin shopping, there's one important fact you simply must accept: The camera you buy will be replaced by an "improved" version within a year. This is true with most things digital, and it can make people feel they should wait because something better is going to come along.
Years ago, when the next generation meant a step up from 1 megapixel to 2 megapixels, next-generation envy was a reasonable concern. Nowadays, the next generation won't necessarily be a dramatic improvement. New models change feature sets and body designs, but only occasionally improve image quality. Sometimes new models are inferior to their predecessors!
Because of the generally high quality of the current technology, you can hedge your bets against obsolescence by picking a camera with features designed for the type of shooting you do and the output you require.


The Best In My Budget ? ?: Choosing a camera is a process of winnowing down the available models until you arrive at a -- hopefully -- obvious conclusion.
Whether you're looking for a cheapo point-and-shoot or a pro-level single-lens reflex (SLR), the first step to take is to decide what you're willing to pay. Then your goal is to find the best camera in your price range.
"Best" should be defined by the particular needs of the type of shooting you do. If you want to output large, high-resolution prints, you need a high-resolution camera. If you want maximum image quality and flexibility, go for a digital SLR. If maximum portability is the most important concern, a small point-and-shoot is going to be best.
Taking this first step of not only narrows the camera field, it also shields you from sleepless nights wondering whether the camera you've bought is the right one. Once you realize that "best" is not an absolute term, you'll be less troubled when a new camera comes out with a feature that, while spiffy, doesn't relate to your type of shooting.

Point-And-Shoot or SLR? :

You can divide digital cameras into many different categories: high-end/low-end, big/small, expensive/cheap, and so on. For the serious shooter, the most important distinction is point-and-shoot versus SLR.
Point-and-Shoot Cameras :While "point-and-shoot" used to imply low quality, don't be prejudiced against this type of camera. Point-and-shoot digital cameras can have pro-quality lenses and yield excellent images.
Point-and-shoot cameras follow roughly the same design as their point-and-shoot counterparts: somewhat boxy shape with an extending zoom lens. All digital point-and-shoots include LCD screens, and on some cameras, the LCD screen is the only viewfinder. (We plan to explain about viewfinders later in this blog.)
When it comes to other features, though, point-and-shoots range from simple no-frills cameras to advanced models that pack extensive advanced controls and options.
Point-and-shoot cameras can also be very quiet, which is handy when shooting in locations where a loud shutter clack is not appropriate.
Many point-and-shoots have unusual designs, such as viewfinders you can rotate independently of the lens. For shooting waist-level shots, or any situation where your subject is hard to frame, you may appreciate the flexibility of a point-and-shoot.
Point-and-shoots often have excellent macro capabilities. Thanks to their small lenses, it's easy for vendors to build in macro facilities that would require an expensive, separate lens on an SLR camera.
SLR Cameras : An SLR differs from a point-and-shoot camera in several important ways. The viewfinder on an SLR looks through the same lens that the camera uses to expose the image sensor. This means that your viewfinder shows you a much more accurate representation of the final image, including the effects of any filters you might have placed on your lens.
Most SLRs also use interchangeable lenses. That lets you attach the lens that's exactly right for your shooting needs and upgrade lenses to improve image quality.
Because of their larger size, most digital SLRs are equipped with image sensors that are much larger than those in point-and-shoot cameras. A larger image sensor usually produces better image quality than a smaller sensor because the individual pixels on the sensor can be larger. Larger pixels produce images with less noise, so SLRs tend to yield better results than point-and-shoots when working in low-light.
SLRs also tend to have higher-end features, such as more rugged bodies, faster burst rates, higher ISO settings, and in some situations, better image quality.
Creatively, the main difference between the two types is that it's possible to shoot shallower depth of field with an SLR.

What Resolution Do You Need?

After deciding on a price range and camera type, you've probably eliminated a good number of candidates. The next big cut comes when you make a resolution choice.
Digital camera vendors try to sell you on a very simple resolution guideline: More is better. This isn't always true.
More pixels means more resolution, which should mean more detail, which should yield a better picture. However, the quality of the pixels can be as important as the number of pixels. A high-resolution camera with a lousy lens produces a bunch of really bad pixels. That's why it's important not to get caught up in the resolution wars
Paying for pixels you don't need is a waste of money. Instead of buying the most pixels you can afford, consider how you might be outputting your images and select a resolution that supports that type of output. To create 13-x-19-inch prints, you'll want a high-resolution camera -- at least 5 megapixels. But if the bulk of your work is smaller prints, or Web output, you probably don't need to pay for extra pixels. You can do a lot with just 3 or 4 megapixels.
Because larger prints are viewed from greater distances, resolution requirements (measured in pixels per inch) go down as you increase print size. For example, you can easily get away with 200 pixels per inch for a 13-x-19-inch print because people generally view it from farther away than they do a 5-x-7-inch print, which needs around 300 pixels per inch.

Higher resolutions buy you more than just larger prints, of course. With more pixels at your disposal, you can enlarge parts of your image and crop to create a full-size print of a smaller portion of your image.
Be aware also that a difference of a single megapixel does not necessarily translate into much greater area. A 50-percent increase in the number of pixels in a camera adds only 22.5 percent more print area. That's the difference between an 8-x-10-inch print and a 10-x-12-inch print -- not a tremendous increase in size. Of course, the higher resolution camera might give you better detail at the same size than the lower-resolution camera.
We suggest that you figure out what print size you'll output most often, then go up one resolution class. This will give you good results at your most-used print size with an option to print a little larger, and extra pixels for times when you want to crop and re-size.

What's Next?Making price and resolution decisions will do more to narrow the field of possible candidates than any other choice you'll make. Now you're ready to start looking at particular cameras and comparing their features and abilities.

Saturday, January 10, 2009


There are certain types of photographs that tend to make viewers shriek "Oh that's cool!" Fruit splashing into water is one of those fun photos that leave everyone scratching their heads and wondering how you did it. This photo genre is actually a very simple photograph.

Items Needed
  • Small clear tank (fishtank, vase, anything with clear, straight sides)
  • Water (or carbonated water for extra bubbles)
  • Aluminum foil
  • Chair or small table
  • Assistant or tripod
  • Fruit
  • Blue fabric or paper
Step one
Make sure your tank or vase is free of scratches and attach the blue fabric or paper to the backside of the tank.

Step two
Fill the tank with water or carbonated water

Step three
Place aluminum foil on top of the small table or chair. This will reflect the sunlight onto the bottom of the fruit for extra light.

Step four
Place table/chair outside in bright sunlight and place tank on top of foil. Note - position tank so that there will not be a shadow from your hand when dropping the fruit

Step five
Position camera on tripod and prefocus on inside of tank. If you have an assistant, holding the camera is fine but be sure you are seated in a stable position.

Step six
Drop the fruit. If you have an assistant, count down to release for them so you will have a better chance of tripping the shutter at the right moment. If you are using a tripod and shooting alone, you will have one finger on the release button and the other hand will drop the fruit. It will take practice to trip the shutter at the right time. Even very experienced photographers have many bad timing shots for this type of image. You can use the timer also if you want.

Hints
  • Use a taller tank to help prevent splashes from hitting your camera.
  • Use a rag to wipe splashes off of the tank between shots. You want the tank to be invisible, not highlighted by waterdrops.
  • Use the fastest shutter speed possible. Water and falling fruit are fast. You will need a shutter speed around 1/1000 of a second or more to sufficiently freeze the action.
  • Relax. This will take practice at first. Once you get the hang of the timing it is very easy though.

http://www.photographyhomepages.com



Log on to http://www.photographyhomepages.com
excellent website...a lots of photography tricks available.  

Friday, November 28, 2008

Bloodstained glasses....


A photograph of John Lennon's bloodstained glasses has sold for almost £9,000 at a London auction.
The photograph, taken by Lennon's widow Yoko Ono and one of only six prints in existence, sold for £8,813.
It was put up for auction at Bonhams in London on 17th April 2002.
Lennon was killed outside his New York apartment by obsessed fan Mark Chapman in 1980.
The photo shows the singer's famous round spectacles next to a glass of water and on a table set against the window of the couple's apartment overlooking Manhattan.
The print up for auction is owned by Johnnie Walker, a fund-raiser for Artist Residencies of Tokyo, or ART.

Thursday, November 27, 2008

As a mark of respect to the victims ,we will not have any posts today.Alternatively a few photographs of mumbai of the bygone era are dedicated .......
Churchgate station












Bhayander Bridge 










Marine drive 















KalbaDevi

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Le Violon d'Ingres


Man Ray, born Emmanuel Radnitzky , was an American photographer who spent most of his career in Paris, France.

In one of these cafés Man Ray managed to win the heart of one of the most renowned women in Montparnasse. Alice Prin was born in Châtillon-sur-Seine, Côte d'Or, Burgundy, France. An illegitimate child, she was raised in abject poverty by her grandmother. At age twelve, she was sent to live with her mother in Paris in order to find work. She first worked in shops and bakeries. By age fourteen, she was posing nude for sculptors, which created discord with her mother.She chose a name Kiki.

Kiki of Montparnasse was incredibly fascinating and extravagant, showing off her short hair, heavy make-up and rouge covered lips Infamous in the Bohemian district,Paris, she was a muse to many painters.

Kiki is the subject of some of Man Ray’s most famous photographs. Other than being Man Ray’s muse, she also played an important part in his life, sentimentally speaking; this helped Man Ray’s visibility and prestige in the Parisian society.

Man Ray was an admirer of the paintings of Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres and made a series of photographs, inspired by Ingres's languorous nudes. He photographed Kiki in the same Ingres pose, painting the f -holes of a stringed instrument onto the print and then rephotographing the print. He titled it ‘Le Violon d'Ingres’ , an ironic title as in French ‘Ingres’ is an idiom for ‘hobby.’ The image of the transformation of Kiki's body into a musical instrument maintains a tension between objectification and appreciation of the female form.

Monday, November 24, 2008

The Leaf....

A rather humble-looking pic has sparked an investigation by researchers into whether this photo is one of the oldest in existence.This photogenic drawing of a leaf that is currently attributed to British photography pioneer William Henry Fox Talbot is considered the oldest photo in the world.

The picture has been in the hands of a private photography dealer representing the Quillan Company since 1989. 

And researchers say although previously estimated to sell for $US100,000 - $US150,000, it could fetch quite a bit more if it's found to be older.

The historical journey back to the birth of photography continues...